Why? Because they are so large and disporportionate that I look like Twiggy with gorilla arms. Veebs and his enormous cat bottom could hide inside undetected. I could jump off a cliff arms extended and maintain altitude. But you won't see me modeling it, oh no.

The arms look totally goofy.

Don't see what the big hoo ha's all about? Let's compare the sleeve width with that of my last completed Rebecca sweater:

Savanna cast on more stitches than the previous sweater, which was in a 2x2 rib. So I don't get why the pattern called for a larger width, in stockinette. Puzzled. Befuddled. Frustrated. I want to decrease the width by as much as 12 stitches, but I'd still have to increase enough towards the underarms to maintain 28 cm circumference there. Which means more increases...In order to maintain the sleeve narrowness AND account for the 28 cm at the underarms, can I increase over a shorter number of rows? Increase every 2 rows instead of 8? Will that make the sleeve all flarey towards the top?

I knew my beginner's luck would run out. Anyway, good learning experience. It's all good. Spring's only a week away but luckily (or not), this is New England. There's still plenty of time to wear thick chunky wool sweaters. Just give it to me without the thick chunky wool sleeves, thanks.

Oh I also stopped by at Spark after work on Friday. It was...aight. Yarn selection was minimal. Paper selection was minial. Then again being Costco of crafts is not their M.O. However, creative inspiration is, so it would have been nice to have seen some examples of fine yarn work on display, some examples of hand-stamped invitations on display, something you could admire and touch and say, I want to make THAT. Show me how to make THAT. But aside from some really lovely jewelry pieces, there was very little. It was all just kind of, sparse, rather than spark.

Tall glass of sidecar full of soothing alcohol is a-callin'. Later.

Comments [0]
Filed Under: Rebecca 28 | Savanna